There is much to look at. However, we will review this paper, at some point: Educational Endowments and the Financial Crisis: Social Costs and Systemic Risks in the Shadow Banking System 2010 (PDF at tellus.org). In the meantime, a few thoughts are collected.
In terms of disclosure, all this will lead to the following: discussions of near zero and its necessity.
The biggest brains are no better than the lowliest worker. That emphasis has gone so heavily into out-housing (use of this does not imply the inability to see the reality of our inter-connected and global world) results, in part, from a seemingly endless set of new exploitees always around the bend.
Too, talents not related to numeracy are essential to the planet's future; yes, techies, innumeracy is not idiocy. How can the numerant (those with numeracy) be allowed to innovate financially without oversight?
The Gulf spill might be a perfect metaphor. We can exploit only so far; at some point, real costs have to be considered. Oh yes, the current state of affairs shows just how easy it is to fall into a debt, and enslave the future, pattern.
Was it Harvard that led us on the path of short-vision'd and, ravage the landscape, business (Cat and mouse)? Well, can it dig back into its roots, those prior to the ingestion of the secularist potion, and develop a coherent non-secular stance that is so sorely needed by the world for a peaceful and productive future?
Suggestion: where is the notion of ethics ever brought into the minds of those who are going to lead the future? Ought not this be more prominent, period by period, throughout the educational experience? Can ethics even be absorbed by one who is reinforced in elitist thinking?
Divine right of the endowed (pun, of course, for best-and-brightest)?
Earlier posts that are related to the theme under development. Not picking on Harvard. BUT, you Crimson guys and gals, you were the first on this side of the pond which, then, brings especial responsibility.
- Harvard, value and quality I -- from whence will come the multi-faceted minds that we need and the training that will raise the worldview?
- Gravy train -- that is, will raise above the notion of massive taking?
- Gray areas -- and, will not try to exploit situations or potential exploitees?
- Win and lose -- success breed hubris; failure causes whining.
- Hedge Funds -- they say that money talks or that money has it privileges. Evidently, one of these is to make your own rules.
- Lessons to be learned -- gosh, the problem? Who's the daddy!
- Oops and more oops -- stumbling going on everywhere, almost densely.
- Cars and quality -- wonderful metaphor for the current economic mess.
- Roles for schools -- more than merely funneling out takers on a massive scale.
- Swarm proof -- even the brightest are under the laws of nature (more full use than normal).
01/23/2013 -- Things are looking up: Read free or die.
10/16/2011 -- Harvard is 375 this year. That, one might say, will precipitate a closer look, soon.
05/17/2011 -- Hedge funds need some of our attention.
04/20/2011 -- Simple living (see Remarks 04/15/2011 - game theory), as opposed to greediness.
04/12/2011 -- Now, we hear that Harvard wants Bernie to teach ethics to the best and brightest! It is obvious that he ought to be a case study and a specimen of what not to do. That is, analyze him to the core. His motivations would be included. The biggest lesson? How we have dumbed down ourselves in order to make the system, and its artifacts (see comments on hive mentality), work.
04/04/2011 -- Boston U's opinion.
02/24/2011 -- People matter.